EL USO DE TECNOLOGÍA EN LA FORMACIÓN DE PROFESORES DE MATEMÁTICAS: UN ANÁLISIS DESDE EL TPCK Y EL MKT

Cesar Martínez Hernández, Lilia P. Aké Tec

Resumen


Se expone una propuesta sobre el uso de tecnología en la formación de profesores de matemáticas, basada en la noción del Conocimiento Matemático para la Enseñanza (MKT) y en el Conocimiento Tecnológico Pedagógico del Contenido (TPCK o TPACK) a partir del análisis y discusión de un ejemplo del uso de GeoGebra, en el contexto de un programa de posgrado sobre formación-profesionalización de profesores de matemáticas.


Palabras clave


Formación de profesores, tecnología, MKT, TPCK

Texto completo:

PDF

Referencias


Ball, D. L. (2000). Bridging practices: Intertwining content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 241-247.

Ball, D., & Bass, H. (2009). With an eye on the mathematical horizont: Knowing mathematics for teaching to learnes’ mathematical futures. Paper presentado en el 43rd Jahrestagung Für Didaktik Der Mathematik. Recuperado el 15 de junio, 2015 de http://www-personal.umich.edu/~dball/presentations /032309_oldenburg.pdf

Ball, D., Thames, M., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching. What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407.

Doerr, H., Arleback, J. & O’neil, A. (2012). Teaching practices, technology and student learning. En L. R. Van Zoest, J-J. Lo & J. L. Kratky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, PME-NA 2012 (pp. 1065-1072). Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan University.

Hill, H., Ball, D. & Schilling, S. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 372-400.

Johnston, C. (2010). Pre-service elementary teachers’ evaluation of technology tools for mathematical learning: A reflective model. En J. Yamamoto; J. Kush; R. Lombard & J. Hertzog (Eds.), Technology Implementation and Teacher Education: Reflective Models (pp. 259-277). USA: Information Science Reference.

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.

Llinares, S. & Krainer, K. (2006). Mathematics (Student) Teachers and Teacher Educators as Learners. En A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of Research on the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 429-460). UK: Sense Publishers.

Martínez, C. & Ulloa, R. (2015). Dynamic geometry software and the tracing of tangents in the context of the mean value theorem. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the PME-NA. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.

Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 509–523

Niess, M. L., Lee, K., Sadri, P. & Suharwoto, G. (2006). Guiding inservice mathematics teachers in developing TPCK. Paper presentado en el Congreso Anual de la Asociación Americana de Investigación Educativa (American Education Research Association). San Francisco, CA. Recuperado el 30 de noviembre, 2015 de http://eusesconsortium.org/docs/AERA_paper.pdf.

Ruthven, K., Hennessy, S. & Brindley, S. (2004). Teacher representations of the successful use of computer-based tools and resources in secondary-school English, mathematics and science. Teacher and Teaching Education, 20, 259-275.

Sowder, J. T. (2007). The mathematical education and the development of teachers. En F. K. Lester, Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, Vol. 1 (pp. 157-224). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.